Bank can go after other assets in Florida if you default on mortgage

Worried that your bank might go after your other assets if you're late on the mortgage or lose your home to foreclosure?

It can happen in Florida, especially if a bank sells your foreclosed house and doesn't recoup the full loan amount and if you're a big-dollar borrower.

With nearly half of all mortgages under water in South Florida, plenty of residents may wonder if their home lender can garnish their wages or suddenly lock down their deposit accounts.

Rules on tapping assets vary by state and depend on the terms of specific loans and accounts.

Problems on typical home loans usually don't crop up before foreclosure. They tend to come after the bank sells the home and ends up short.

In Florida, banks can go to court for a "deficiency judgment" to collect the rest of the money owed on a mortgage after foreclosure, said Anthony di Marco, vice president of the Florida Bankers Association.

Banks can pursue other assets with that judgment. They can file a lien on your boat or car. But "they can't jump priority on a loan," so the lender for that boat or car has first dibs to collect, di Marco said.

Florida banks usually don't target other assets after foreclosure if they don't see much to tap. "Collecting on judgments is time-consuming and costly," said real estate attorney Shari Olefson, a partner at Fowler White Boggs in Fort Lauderdale and author of "Foreclosure Nation: Mortgaging the American Dream."

But banks pay more attention to borrowers with multimillion-dollar homes or businesses that default on big commercial properties. The lender can check if the customer has other accounts with the same bank. Depending on the terms of those savings or checking accounts, they may move to freeze, sweep, garnish or otherwise tap those accounts to collect money owed, Olefson said.

There's another risk for smaller borrowers later. Banks may sell their deficiency judgments to a collection agency. The judgments are valid for up to 20 years. That leaves an agency focused on collections ample time to come after you for the balance still due, she said.

"That's why it's so important for people to deal with these mortgage problems upfront," Olefson said. "So if you have the chance to do a short-sale through the bank, or if you have the chance to negotiate with the bank and clear up the loan — rather than have this financial time-bomb ticking over your head for years — you'll be so much better off working with the bank."

And be sure get any settlement reached with the bank in writing, mortgage specialists add.

No matter what, some types of assets are off the table when banks look to collect money due on homes.

Some federal payments cannot be garnisheed at any time to cover a mortgage. Those include Social Security checks, veterans benefits and some railroad retirement payments, among others, according to the American Bankers Association in Washington, D.C.

Some states don't let banks go after an individual's assets after a home is seized and sold, said Mark Tenhundfeld, the association's senior vice president of regulatory policy.

Even with a deficiency judgment, Florida law specifies 11 items that cannot be garnisheed to pay court orders in most cases, including unemployment benefits, disability checks and payments from Supplemental Security Income, a federal anti-poverty program.

Consumers in Florida have complained about what they see as improper garnishments by banks.

The Florida Office of Financial Regulation said concerns often center on Supplemental Security Income payments garnisheed to pay the mortgage loan.

But a consumer can reverse the practice by showing that the law exempts that income from garnishment or by going to court to resolve the issue, said Flora Beal, a spokeswoman for the regulators office.

Banks have sometimes garnisheed funds that are electronically deposited into a customer's account, not knowing that the money came from exempt sources, according to the Florida Bankers Association.

The borrower's recourse: Inform your bank that the money is exempt and seek to get it back, said the association's di Marco.

That's not always easy, according to South Florida building contractor James Clare III.

Clare said he fell off a roof during a job, was disabled and lost income. He ran late on mortgage payments and other bills. One day, he found that his bank would not allow him access to a disability award electronically deposited into his account at the same bank.

Clare engaged a lawyer, but he said it took weeks for the bank to give him access to the funds and then, only after he agreed to bring some payments up to date.

"I had no choice. It would have cost me more to go to court. My attorney said by the time I'd pay all the fees and all the bills over a year or two, the money's gone," said Clare. "It was the most frustrating time."

January 10, 2011 | By Doreen Hemlock, Sun Sentinel

Solar power beginning to go mainstream

NEW YORK – Oct. 24, 2011 – Solar energy may finally get its day in the sun.

The high costs that for years made it impractical as a mainstream source of energy are plummeting. Real estate companies are racing to install solar panels on office buildings. Utilities are erecting large solar panel “farms” near big cities and in desolate deserts. And creative financing plans are making solar more realistic than ever for homes.

Solar power installations doubled in the United States last year and are expected to double again this year. More solar energy is being planned than any other power source, including nuclear, coal, natural gas and wind.

“We are at the beginning of a turning point,” says Andrew Beebe, who runs global sales for Suntech Power, a manufacturer of solar panels.

Solar’s share of the power business remains tiny. But its promise is great. The sun splashes more clean energy on the planet in one hour than humans use in a year, and daytime is when power is needed most. And solar panels can be installed near where people use power, reducing or eliminating the costs of moving power through a grid.

Solar power has been held back by costs. It’s still about three times more expensive than electricity produced by natural gas, according to estimates by the Energy Information Administration.

But the financial barriers are falling fast. Solar panel prices have plunged by two-thirds since 2008, making it easier for installers to market solar’s financial benefits, and not simply its environmental ones. Homeowners who want to go solar can do so for free and pay the same or less for their power.

Last month two of the nation’s biggest utilities, Exelon and NextEra Energy, each acquired a large California solar power farm in the early stages of development. Another utility, NRG Energy, has announced a plan with Bank of America and the real estate firm Prologis to spend $1.4 billion to install solar systems on 750 commercial rooftops.

Nationwide, solar power installations grew by 102 percent from 2009 to 2010, by far the fastest rate in the past five years.

“Every manufacturer globally is looking around for the next major growth market, and the U.S. is the first one everyone points to,” says Shayle Kann, managing director for solar research at GTM Research.

Making solar affordable still requires large tax breaks and other subsidies from federal and state governments. The main federal subsidy pays for 30 percent of the cost of a residential system. When state and other subsidies are added, as much as 75 percent of the cost can be covered.

But prices of solar panels, the squares of crystalline silicon or thin layers of metal films that turn the sun’s rays into electricity, are falling so fast that its advocates now credibly claim that solar will be able to compete with fossil fuels even when the federal solar subsidy shrinks by two-thirds in 2016.

“Over the past 10 years the industry has made the case that we needed to increase scale so we could reduce prices,” says Arno Harris, CEO of solar developer Recurrent Energy, a subsidiary of Sharp Corp. “We’re seeing it happen.”

The falling prices have made it easier for solar installers to raise the money needed to grow. And they’ve made solar power systems so affordable they can appeal to homeowners who want to save on their electric bill, not just reduce their environmental impact.

Tim Johnson, a high school math teacher in Philadelphia, had wanted to put solar panels on his roof for years. Like many people concerned about the environment, the thought of powering his home without burning fossil fuels had a strong appeal. But with two kids in college, he couldn’t justify spending $15,000, after subsidies, to do it.

But since March, he has generated 50 percent to 75 percent of his electricity with a set of solar panels on his roof, saving 20 percent on his electricity bills. His upfront cost for the system: $0.

Instead of buying and installing the panels himself, he signed up with SunRun, one of a handful of companies that build, own and maintain solar systems on homes. These companies earn money by charging customers for the power the panels produce.

Johnson pays SunRun $52 a month, and he pays his traditional utility for whatever extra power he needs from the grid. In all, he pays $60 to $100 a month for power; he used to pay $90 to $120.

SunRun can charge Johnson a competitive rate because federal and state subsidies pay for a portion of the installation. Also, the arrangement allows SunRun to take advantage of one of solar’s big advantages. Because it is generated near where it is needed, it doesn’t have to pass through hundreds of miles of wires, transformers and other equipment. The power price SunRun has to beat in order to entice customers like Johnson is an expensive retail rate, bloated with transmission and distribution charges that home solar doesn’t incur.

It would be cheaper over the long run for a homeowner to buy and install a solar system because he would not have to pay a company like SunRun for financing, service and maintenance. But these plans have growing appeal because they don’t require homeowners to lay out thousands of dollars up front.

In California, which leads the nation in solar power installations, 51 percent of the residential solar systems installed through the first three quarters of this year were sold with these plans, up from 12 percent in 2009.

SunRun and competitors such as SolarCity and Sungevity are expanding into more states, including Arizona, Colorado, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Last month, Google announced it would create a fund that local installers in every state can tap so they too can offer no-money-down plans.

Some installers are teaming up with big hardware chains Home Depot and Lowe’s in an effort to expose solar to customers who might not otherwise consider it.

“Awareness is still one of our biggest problems,” says Lynn Jurich, co-founder and president of SunRun, which has a partnership with Home Depot.

Solar panel prices have been declining for years because of lower costs for polycrystalline silicon, the main raw material for most solar panels, and larger-scale manufacturing, especially in Asia. In the last six months, demand has dropped sharply in Germany, the world’s biggest solar market, in response to shrinking subsidies. This has created a global glut of solar panels and accelerated the decline in prices.

Solar panels, which are priced based on the amount of power they can produce during full sunshine, sold for $1.34 per watt in mid-September, according to data from Bloomberg New Energy Finance. That’s down from $1.90 at the beginning of 2010. In 2008, they sold for $4 a watt.

The glut has been gut wrenching for companies that make solar panels. Many of them remain profitable and are growing. But three U.S. panel makers have filed for bankruptcy in two months, including Solyndra, a solar panel maker that received a $528 million federal loan.

Falling profit margins are scaring investors. The stock price of First Solar Inc. has fallen from $170 in April to $53.77. Suntech Power Holdings Co. Ltd. has fallen from $11 to $2.07 over the same period.

The market will not get any easier for small solar panel makers. General Electric Co., Samsung and other big companies are entering the market. This should increase supply and bring down costs even further. GE announced this month that it would build the largest panel factory in the U.S., near Denver.

But what has been treacherous for solar panel makers has been a boon for companies that market and install solar systems, for companies that make electronics and other parts for solar systems, and for solar customers.

To be sure, solar is growing from a very small base. All of the panels now installed across the nation produce enough electricity to power 600,000 homes, or about as much electricity as one large coal-fired power plant.

There are 30,000 megawatts’ worth of solar projects awaiting approval in the U.S., according to the American Public Power Association. Not all of them will be built, either because of regulatory or financial hurdles. But even if only half that is ultimately built, it would be five times what is already installed.

“We’re going in the direction the planet and the industry needs to go,” says Harris.

Copyright © 2011 The Associated Press, Jonathan Fahey, AP energy writer. All rights reserved.

Bank: ‘We’ll reduce your loan, you share future appreciation"

NEW YORK – July 28, 2011 – Ocwen Financial Corp., a servicer of residential mortgages, launched a new loan modification program to reduce the principal on a mortgage for delinquent borrowers, but the borrowers must agree to let loan investors share in future appreciation of the home’s value when the market recovers.

Through the Shared Appreciation Modification program (SAMs), Ocwen will write down the principal of the loan to 95 percent of the home’s current market value. The amount written down will then be forgiven in one-third increments over a three-year timespan, as long as the homeowner remains current on the modified mortgage.

Then, “when the house is later sold or refinanced, the borrower must share 25 percent of the appreciation with the investors that own the loan; borrowers keep 75 percent of the gain,” the company notes.

Loan modifications will be available only to homeowners in negative equity.

“Like all modifications, SAMs help homeowners avoid foreclosure. But they also restore equity,” says Ocwen CEO Ronald Faris in a public statement about the program. “That’s a significant benefit to the customer and, we believe, the economy and housing market. Psychologically, it’s important too. Our analytics tell us that an underwater mortgage is one-and-a-half to two-times more likely to default than one with at least some positive equity.”

The program, which is expected to be rolled out into 33 states, is one of the first principal reduction programs started by a private company.

Source: “Ocwen Unveils New Principal Reduction Program,” HousingWire (July 26, 2011) and “Ocwen Offering Mortgage Modifications That Restore Equity for Underwater Borrowers,” GlobeNewswire (July 26, 2011)

© Copyright 2011 INFORMATION, INC. Bethesda, MD (301) 215-4688

Sarasota - Manatee Foreclosure 'rocket docket' grounded

By TODD RUGER

Published: Sunday, July 10, 2011 at 5:05 p.m.

The foreclosure "rocket docket" came to Sarasota and Manatee counties two years ago in a flurry of controversy, with hundreds of people standing to lose their home in hearings scheduled to take less than two minutes.

Last month, those expedited court proceedings ended without any hubbub. State funding ran out to pay retired judges and other court workers needed to handle up to 250 foreclosure cases a day.

The loss leaves Sarasota's court system to choke on more than 15,000 pending foreclosures — so many cases that properties can languish in the court system for years before a foreclosure auction.

The end of expedited hearings mean that banks trying to seize homes quickly could see more delays. That may be good news for homeowners, who might have more time before they are forced to move out of their homes.

But experts say it is bad news for the housing recovery because the faster foreclosed properties can be resold to new owners, the faster housing values can recover.

And it will hurt those belonging to homeowner's associations, who have to make up the excess costs when nobody is paying assessments on a property caught in the legal system.

Judges in Sarasota and Manatee counties will still look at ways to whittle down the backlog, but only when they have extra time.

The rocket docket, Circuit Judge Lee Haworth said, will now be more like "a Vespa docket."

The effort to expedite foreclosures began as a way to to handle the huge increase in cases and to stop lenders from purposefully delaying their own cases.

Many lenders allowed cases to founder because when they legally retake the properties they become responsible for paying taxes, insurance and maintenance costs until homes are resold.

When attorneys representing banks do not push cases through the court system, it can leave houses sitting empty for years, putting downward pressure on home values in that neighborhood.

Without the rocket docket, which had court officials set hearings for older cases, judges will have to rely on attorneys for lenders to push the cases through to a foreclosure sale by scheduling hearings. But 30 to 40 percent of those lenders have instructed their attorneys not to hurry the cases for financial reasons, Haworth said.

"So if a party or an attorney has some reason not to move the case, then we don't have any way to move the cases forward on our own," said Haworth, the 12th Judicial Circuit's administrative judge over foreclosures.

Gulfcoast Legal Services in Sarasota, which represents those who cannot afford attorneys, went to most rocket docket sessions to catch homeowners who needed help but did not know the legal system.

"I think it's probably good news for the homeowners who are trying to work something out with their lender," Gulfcoast Managing Attorney Elizabeth Boyle said. "We may see lenders make more reasonable offers as the crisis lingers on."

Rocket dockets used around the state have been criticized in some cases for rushing foreclosures without giving homeowners a chance to fight the seizure of their home. Defense attorneys who saw repeated mistakes in paperwork from lenders contend the speed of the hearings could mean some homeowners slipped through the cracks or lost property they should have kept.

While some lenders are content with letting the cases sit, homeowners who pay assessments and their homeowner associations are frustrated because they wind up losing money while no one pays the fees on a foreclosed house.

Once a bank claims ownership, it can sell the house, or begin paying the fees itself.

"The association has to wait for the banks to get hearing time, which may be a couple months down the road," said Sarasota attorney Michelle A. Stellaci Rowe, who represents homeowner associations in foreclosures.

"As each month goes by, assessments are lost. It can add to thousands and thousands of dollars for the association," Stellaci Rowe said. "The people who are paying have to pay more, they have to carry the burden for those who don't pay."

As of this week, the soonest hearing time available for some types of foreclosure hearings was four months out, Haworth said.

At the last rocket docket hearing in Sarasota County, Senior Judge Harry Rapkin dismissed about 60 foreclosure cases caught up in legal issues because they were handled by a foreclosure firm that abandoned the cases.

New firms were not yet ready to handle the cases, which dated back to 2007. Now those cases will have to start over at the beginning of the foreclosure process.

Copyright © 2011 HeraldTribune.com — All rights reserved. Restricted use only.

Local markets heat up with investors

May 31, 2011 – Real estate investors, by three to one, will be more active in their local markets compared to typical homebuyers in the next 24 months; and 69 percent of investors say it’ll be easier to find properties in the near future, according to a survey of real estate investors released by Move, Inc., the management company overseeing Realtor.com.

The Move Investor survey suggests that local markets will be heating up with renewed investor interest and activity. Compared to a year ago, 62 percent of investors are paying more attention to home values in their local markets – only 43.5 percent say it will be harder to find bargains and 41.5 percent expect it to be easier to sell their properties in the next six months.

Meanwhile, 22 percent of investors are bullish and expect prices to rise in the next six to 12 months, and 53.5 percent expect prices to remain relatively the same. Twenty-three percent expect prices to fall in the next six to 12 months.

The Move Investor survey also found that investors are prepared to compete vigorously with traditional first-time homebuyers for hot deals. Two-thirds of investors (65.5 percent) said they expect that first-time buyers’ problems getting a mortgage will make it easier for investors to compete for properties. One in five investors (18.5 percent) say they’ll be cash-only buyers, a strategy that’s out of reach for most first-time buyers. Eight out of 10 (80.5 percent) expect cash discounts from sellers.

Today’s investors – not stereotypical, deal-driven flippers

Contrary to the tactics used by “flippers,” 50 percent of today’s real estate investors plan to hold their properties for five-plus years. Only 11 percent expect to sell within 12 months of purchase. Two-thirds (67.5 percent) say they’re investing for the long term.

Fifty-nine percent (59 percent) told Move they’re new to real estate investing, with 33.5 percent considering their first investment purchase and 8.5 percent in the process of buying and selling their first investment property. Another 17 percent said they just completed their first transaction and plan to make more. Only 36.5 percent have experience in more than one property transaction.

When it comes to repairs and maintenance, 56.5 percent of investors say the repair and maintenance of investment property has not been difficult. Moving forward, 42 percent plan to invest their own time and energy to improve, repair and maintain their properties. The rest said they’d hire a contractor for repairs (29.5 percent) or purchase move-in-ready properties (28 percent). The majority (65.7 percent), don’t expect repair costs to exceed 20 percent of the property’s purchase price.

“This data suggests today’s climate is hot for investing and is attracting a lot of new people that don’t fit the stereotypical deal-driven flippers that buy and sell properties quickly,” said Move, Inc. Chief Executive Officer Steve Berkowitz.

Investors combine cash and credit to snap up properties

While cash is king in many circles, 75.5 percent plan to combine cash and credit to purchase properties as they build their real estate portfolio. In fact, 59.5 percent plan to put less than half down on their next property purchase and they’ll finance the rest. Those planning to use more than 50 percent cash and finance the remainder account for 16 percent of today’s investors. Investors told Move the second most difficult challenge has been finding financing (57 percent).

“The fact that most real estate investors plan on combing cash and credit for their purchases goes against the conventional wisdom that investor transactions today are mostly cash-only sales,” says Berkowitz. “We were surprised to learn that 75 percent of investors are financing portions of their purchases. This suggests they’re seeing tremendous or once in a lifetime opportunities and may be tapping into credit or taking out second trusts on existing properties. The data also shows they’re expecting high returns to match the level of investment they’re making in an arena that is new to many investors.”

High risk leads to high ROI expectations

Based on the investments they’re making in today’s environment, real estate investors clearly expect high yield returns. Nearly half (48 percent) expect a profit of 20 percent or more from their property investments, a 4 percent annual rate of return over five years. Another 40 percent expect a profit of 10 percent, and only 6.5 percent expect a 5 percent or less return on investment. Half (50 percent) of today’s real estate investors plan to hold their properties for five-plus years.

Property investments gateway to homeownership for many

While the survey shows investors will outnumber traditional homebuyers three to one, nearly half (49 percent) plan to live in their investment property until it’s sold or turned into a rental property. Slightly more than half (56.5 percent) will put their investments to work as rental properties, and 28 percent plan to purchase vacation property that they’ll eventually sell. The Move Investor survey also found 30 percent of real estate investors are interested in buying retirement property as an investment.

“The survey suggests some first-time buyers may be looking at investing as a strategy to becoming homeowners,” Berkowitz said. “While today’s market is tough for some, it’s also motivating millions to take an unconventional approach and creatively search for new ways of entering the housing market.”

© 2011 Florida Realtors®

Tax Exemptions May Leave Many More Not Paying Any Tax

TAMPA, Fla. – May 24, 2011 – Florida’s turbulent housing market has had an unintended consequence: Thousands of homeowners don’t pay a dollar in property tax.

No, this isn’t a real estate scam. Blame higher homestead exemptions and falling home prices that essentially removed houses from the tax rolls.

“It’s a basic fundamental in American society and tax policy that everybody should pay something,” said Warren Weathers, chief deputy for the Hillsborough County property appraiser’s office. “Some of these (exemptions) were created for people who barely have anything, and that’s not bad. But there are people ... that have the ability to pay that don’t pay some of their fair share.”

It couldn’t have come at a worse time for budget-conscious municipalities. The exemptions cost the county millions in property tax revenue, and that’s on top of millions lost because of falling values. Hillsborough County saw property taxes owed go from $1.9 billion in 2008 to $1.7 billion in 2009 to $1.5 billion in 2010.

For many of those with tax bills of zero, their properties are valued less by county property appraisers than their qualified homestead exemption, usually $25,000. For properties worth more, a $50,000 exemption brings the tax bill down to almost nothing.

In Hillsborough, more than 7,000 homeowners didn’t pay property taxes last year, according to data from the property appraiser’s office. That’s up from 4,920 in 2008.

An additional 5,700 pay some tax, such as to the school board, but they don’t contribute anything toward the county’s general fund. And that’s where the money comes from to pay public services such as roads, sewer service and libraries. That number is up from 1,238 in 2007.

The homes range from modest to middle-class to extravagant. Most owners who don’t owe property taxes live in poor neighborhoods where home values have plummeted.

For example, a shotgun-style home at 2809 N. 10th St., in the Ybor City area north of Interstate 4, is valued at $23,569 by the county property appraiser. The owner has a $25,000 homestead exemption. Taxable value: zero.

Sybil Faulker, 86, has owned the 10th Street home for 50 years and has never paid property taxes. Faulker, who lives on Social Security, said the lower tax bill is critical for the poor, especially in a deep recession.

“It’s a huge help, and I live in a 91-year-old home,” Faulker said. “When people have a brand-new home worth $200,000 to $300,000, that’s different. They have the income to pay.”

Even the housing boom wasn’t enough to push up the value of Faulker’s home enough to cause her to owe property taxes, county records show. But for many, rising values caused property taxes to increase beyond what they could afford. Exemptions were provided to help alleviate the burden, but now that values have plummeted, the exemptions allow more people to pay little or no tax.

During the housing boom, the homestead exemption was raised from $25,000 to $50,000. The Legislature mandated that the second $25,000 could not bring the taxable value to zero. Instead, the property would have to be worth more than $75,000 to get the full $50,000 exemption.

Still, the extra savings is big for some.

Consider a home at 2810 N. 10th St., which sold in 2004 for $145,000. It’s now valued at $67,287 by the property appraiser. The owner has a homestead exemption of $42,287, bringing the taxable value to $25,000.

Few homes in this neighborhood sold, even during the housing boom. Many of the owners are elderly and have stayed put. So these homes weren’t affected by investors who flooded other neighborhoods, artificially driving up prices during the housing bubble.

Hillsborough has always had low-valued homes, especially in the inner city and some rural areas, Weathers said. But other changes to real estate, such as apartment-to-condominium conversions and toxic drywall made in China, have sent taxable values plummeting.

Consider this condo conversion at the Towers at Carrollwood Village. One condo unit sold for $90,000 in 2005 and is now valued at $19,657. The homestead exemption is $17,250, bringing the taxable value to zero.

The rest of the 114 condos in the complex have a similar tax situation, said Chris Weiss of the Hillsborough County property appraiser’s office.

A condominium complex in New Tampa is in the same boat. The Villas Condominiums has 282 units, Weiss said, and was also saturated with investor-owners. Both complexes have been hit hard by foreclosures, he said.

A condo at the New Tampa development sold for $106,900 in 2005 and is now worth just $16,230. The homestead exemption brings the taxable value to nothing.

Toxic drywall costs the county about $1 million in property taxes, Weathers said.

“That’s because Florida gives owners of houses with the tainted drywall a break on their taxes. As long as the drywall is in the house, it isn’t worth anything, say state legislators who passed the bill.

“No one wants to buy a home with this drywall problem,” Weathers said.

The owners of a million-dollar home on Davis Islands saw their tax bill go from $20,192 in 2009 to $6,310. The home’s toxic drywall has made it worthless, according to the county property appraiser. The taxes due for the property are on land only.

Judy Redmiller, a homeowner in South Tampa, says she pays hefty taxes now but didn’t when she lived in Ybor City because her home was valued lower. She says she supports some tax breaks for people who need it, but paying nothing is unreasonable.

“I think everyone should pay some amount because the money goes to schools, streets, services that benefit us all,” Redmiller said.

Private property appraiser David Teacher said he understands people wanting their neighbors to pay their fair share but, he said, there is an upside. Falling home prices and no – or low – property tax is a big incentive for investors to buy.

“There have been some people that say, ‘Oh, that doesn’t sound fair.’ But I have to say the good thing about this is all the cash purchases and investors who are coming and helping us stabilize this market.”

Teacher said he has seen homes in East Tampa selling for as low as $7,000. Sure, he said, they need work, but most still could be good deals.

“What better investment,” he said. “Look at the return on your money. Some homes are selling for less than the cost of a car.”

Copyright © 2011 Tampa Tribune, Fla., Shannon Behnken. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

Sarasota Realtors Report Rebound in Sales and Prices

by Harold Bubil

Both the number of sales, and, more importantly for homeowners, the average selling price of homes sold in March rebounded from February’s level, according to a just-released report from the Sarasota Association of Realtors.

SAR members sold 800 properties in March – which was the most since September 2005, when the real estate boom started to fade.

March’s selling prices rose by double digits for both houses and condos from the previous month, and pending sales were at the highest level since the real estate boom ended in 2005.

Inventory dropped to 5,501 – less than a third of the available properties on the market during the bad years following the boom.

“Sarasota is clearly a recovering market,” said SAR President Michael Bruno. “Agents are very busy showing properties and writing contracts, and people are excited about our strong market rebound. Obviously, we haven’t seen numbers like these in several years. There is a buzz in the local market that’s reaching out to buyers across the nation and even internationally.”

Highlights of the report:

– House sales, at 580, were up 23 percent from the previous month, and 5 percent from March 2010, when the home-buyer tax credit encouraged 555 purchases.

– Condo sales, at 220, were up 10 percent from February, and 11 percent from March 2010.

– Median sales prices for both houses and condominiums increased to $159,250 for houses and $173,000 for condos, representing a 16 percent and a 26 percent jump, respectively.

– Distressed property sales fell to 43 percent of the total. In February, 47 percent of all sales were foreclosures or short sales.

– The inventory of for-sale houses fell to 6.0 months, down from 8.0 months in February. This could represent “the cusp of a seller’s market,” said the report. For condos, the remaining months of inventory dropped to 9.2 months from 10.4 months in February. Realtors consider a 6-month supplyof for-sale homes to be a balanced market between buyers and sellers.

“Price appreciation normally follows a declining inventory and increased competition among buyers,” explained Bruno. “I’m still hopeful that this trend, which has been evident now for several months, continues into the summer months. Last year, we saw strong activity in April, May and June, probably connected to the federal tax credit. But there is evidence the trend will repeat this year after seeing the March sales and pending sales figures.”